top of page
Writer's picturenicole calder

how many times do you think you say this phrase throughout a day? i say phrase rather than question because i'm really not sure we're ever actually genuinely asking, how are you? it's more of a nicety, a social norm. you don't just say "hey" or "hello" (or in my case, "howdy") but it's always followed by a "how's it going" "how are you today". on the surface, this is a nice thing to do, right? but is it possible this unconscious conditioning is actually harmful to our wellbeing?


i was prompted to think about this upon meeting two Germans at the cafe i work at. in attempt to display my limited knowledge of German i said, "Guten tag, wie geht's dir?" (which translates to "hello, how are you?"). these ladies were very quick to tell me not to use that phrase in Germany. curious, i asked them why. "because we don't ask that question unless we genuinely want to know how someone is. here, in Australia, we get asked it all the time. but no one actually cares for the answer."


i've often thought this too. how many times have you been asked, how are you? and felt that the asker is genuinely interested in your answer? not to mention, how do you answer that question? am i the only one who ever feels overwhelmed by what seems like a simple question? how am i - in this moment? how am i - today? how am i - mentally? physically? emotionally? how am i - doing in life in general? because the truth is, how we are changes moment to moment. and the answer can rarely be succinctly wrapped up in a quick reply.


i think what i'm trying to get at with this post is that we've lost the ability to check in with others. we've become so addicted to superficiality, to convenience, that we have forgotten to stop and check in with those around us. and admittedly, i've fallen victim to this too. i can't remember the last time i caught up with a friend and i asked them how they're doing, in general. our phones have made us more accessible, but less connected. we feel content going months without seeing friends and only communicating through a screen. but a screen is so impersonal. and i don't know about others, but i'm horrible at replying. i don't want to talk about my life through digital characters. i want to articulate my thoughts, in person, where i know i have the other person's full attention.


maybe all of this comes down to the lost art of friendship. numerous studies have shown that the number of people we feel we can depend on in a crisis has steadily declined over the past 10-20 years. it used to be 5, now most people feel like they don't even have one person they could call upon - why is that? when was the last time you felt truly seen or heard by a friend? now let's flip that, when was the last time you truly heard and saw a friend? texting doesn't suffice. and it's killing our connections with others.


i've found that being in a relationship is both the best and worst thing to happen to people and friendships. best thing, because invariably individuals become a better version of themselves - they feel more secure, settled, fulfilled. worse though, because often people become less intentional. their needs are being met by their partner, so why venture out and communicate with friends? when someone is single, their friendships are their livelihood - they're a necessity. but when people get into relationships, friendships almost feel like an inconvenience. they take effort. and in a world that is becoming increasingly more dependent on convenience and instant gratification, it's no wonder that our friendships are being neglected. but at what cost?


i for one know that i'm lonely. i'm in a very loving and supporting relationship, which fulfills almost all of my needs, but i still find myself missing my friends. i miss our thought-provoking chats. i miss the learning of others' lives. i miss the connections. i think as we get older, it becomes too easy to forget about our friends and too hard to make effort. but we need to. humans need friends. we're social creatures and we can't rely upon one person to fulfill all of our needs. i've had many friendships over the years dissipate into nothingness and i'm still, to this date, at a loss for how it happened. i've found losing a friend hurts more than losing a partner. often with a partner we can rationalise that we weren't compatible, but for a friend? it's a lot harder to understand. especially because there's often no closure - people terminate friendships not intentionally, but by conveniently ignoring communications i.e. ghosting them.


the more that technology continues to dominate society, the more that we need to be intentional with those in our lives. sending a message 'checking in' doesn't suffice. people need people. the only way to feel truly connected to others is by spending time with them and asking the hard questions. but more importantly, listening to their answers. connections are born in vulnerability. but the only way for others to be vulnerable is to be intentional about creating an environment where others share their humanness. we need to get back to the basics. we need to learn how to be better friends again.

24 views0 comments
Writer's picturenicole calder

last week, i received an email from a w-league club inviting me to a trial. i had sent out my highlight reel from pre-season and the first half of my wnpl season to the majority of w-league clubs (in which i had contacts) back in june. for the clubs that replied, the response was a resounding 'no'. but here was a club that offered me a chance - a trial. a glimmer of hope. fantastic right? people all around me, "it's fantastic you're finally getting recognised. even if nothing comes from this, it's a step in the right direction." but is it?


perhaps i'm cynical, or perhaps i'm merely realistic. i initially had a conflict on the date of the trial and asked if there were any other opportunities to trial. but there wasn't. so i knew that whatever chance i had relied entirely on this one trial. so, i cancelled my presentation, booked flights, accommodation, and a car - all at my own expense - and flew over to sydney.


twenty-two girls were trialling. and from what i know, only for a few spots. was a centreback one of those positions? i'll never know. what i do know, is all of these girls were in their early 20s and i was an outlier at 30. the majority of the girls, including myself, had played games less than 24 hours prior to this trial and would then be playing 3x15mins full-sized games (after an extensive warm up). for the youth, no problem. for me, more of a problem.


there's a few things i really hate about 'trials' - the main thing though, is the trepidation that leads into it. there's no interview, there's no personal introduction with anyone, you're literally being judged entirely on what you can and can't do. and for anyone who's read any of my work, a trial probably isn't going to feel like the safest environment to excel. you're probably going to be more focused on not making mistakes than you are on trying anything to make you stand out. and in essence, that's how my trial went. i didn't stand out. i played it 'safe'. as a centreback in a comfortable environment, i take risks. i push up. i play the 'high risk, high reward' ball often. but in this trial, i didn't have familiarity with teammates, so i tried my best to just keep the ball. and i did. but a coach isn't going to select you for playing it 'safe'. a lot of what makes me the player i am are the moments that aren't always replicable, especially in a trial. it's the desperation to block a shot, it's the goal from a corner, it's the slide to intercept a pass - but none of those opportunities presented themselves monday night. so in the eyes of the coaching staff, i undoubtedly looked very average.


hope is a funny thing. people say it's a positive, but i've always thought it to be destructive. the buddhists say suffering comes from expectation and i would extend that to say suffering comes from hope too. this trial offered hope. but it's also opened the door for disappointment, again. when coaches say 'no' without having a look at you, you don't lose anything. it's a lot easier to accept and justify as them just not liking your highlight reel. but when you trial and don't succeed, it's harder to reason. it's harder to not internalise. they did see you, and the answer was still a no. so perhaps, just perhaps, you actually aren't good enough to play at that next level.


and that is where i find myself, again. stuck in this cycle of self-doubt and disappointment. the question that keeps circling in my mind is, "has this ship sailed?" am i now too old? in 2019, after i did my acl for the third time, i accepted that w-league would never happen for me. i was 26 years old, had torn my acl 3 times, who in their right mind would take a chance on a player like that? fast forward 4 years - i'm still playing, and playing some of my best soccer yet. i've scored 13 goals in 29 games this year, as a centreback, and every year i hold onto the hope that maybe, just maybe, i might get noticed. "if you do well enough in your local league, people will notice. they'll tap you on the shoulder." will they though? or have i just not done 'well enough'?


the thing is, i have been on the losing side of the matthew effect for the last fifteen years of my life. the matthew effect states that the rich get richer and the poor get poorer. so in relation to sport, once your name is known, it will continue to be known. if your name isn't known, it will continue to stay unknown. in my juniors, i benefited from the former - i was selected in state teams before i even trialled. i was also chosen in the all-star team at nationals, not because i had a stand-out tournament, but because at the time i was attending junior matildas camps and it wouldn't be a good look if i didn't get selected. but ever since i went to america, my name went missing. for 6 years i didn't play in the wnpl. for 6 years my name wasn't in circulation. so when i returned, i had to recreate that name. and i've been trying to recreate that name ever since.


look at the players that sign for w-league clubs, where do they come from? other w-league clubs. even if they've had absolutely horrible seasons, they will still get signed the following year. even if they’ve been injured for the last 12 months, they’ll still get signed. because as a coach, you're not taking a risk signing someone who has previously been signed - someone else took that risk for you. you're merely keeping the status quo, keeping their name circulating. but to sign someone who has never been signed? that's a big risk. and an even bigger risk when they're older because they probably don't have many years left in their development. humans are typically risk averse - so i get it. but how many players are out there who have been overlooked because of this effect? because of our biases towards certain players? i use the example of clare hunt - how many years has she been overlooked? her transition into international football was nearly seamless - but where would she be had she been picked up earlier?


i find myself stuck. what i want from soccer, i won't find here in the wnpl. all my life i've been involved in professional environments - i grew up in the SASI program where we trained 5-6 days a week, then i went to college on a scholarship which was full time again. the wnpl here is 3 days a week. and i often find myself frustrated because my teammates don't seem to care. but i realise that's because this isn't a professional environment, and it probably won't become one. many of the frustrations i’ve experienced over the years can be attributed to being in this incompatible environment. i want more, but the reality i'm finding myself in over and over again, is perhaps i'm not good enough for that next level. there's wnpl, and then there's w-league. and i'm stuck, somewhere between the two. wanting more, but not getting more. so without a name, without the experience, and probably without the skills, i really am at a loss for how i am ever going to break into that next level.



232 views0 comments

i've been struggling to write this post because i wasn't sure i could sufficiently articulate the heaviness of my thoughts. nor was i sure i was ready for people to know the depths of the darkness that has been occupying my mind for months now. they say we never share 80% of the thoughts that consume us, so i guess this is my attempt at doing just that.


despite having written on this topic before, i have never done so with as much emotion as i am currently experiencing. when i was in Tasmania in the new year, i found myself obsessing over death. as we drove around the beautiful countryside of Tassie, my mind was swallowed by the heaviness of death. i never really allow myself to 'go there' - to really think about what happens after we die, because doing so is enough to make me sick to my stomach. i am, and always have been, petrified of death. i feel paralysed by the finality of it. the fact that we have no idea what happens, the fact that there might not be 'anything else' literally scares the shit out of me. and i don't know how to shake these feelings.


for most of our lives, we're ignorant to the inevitability of not just our own demise, but the demise of others. they say ignorance is bliss, and perhaps it is. because i can guarantee the thoughts and feelings that have been dominating my heart and mind for the past six weeks have been nothing less than debilitating.


i have recently had family and friends who have lost their Mum/Mom and it has made me think about my own parents. about how fortunate i am to still have them around, but also how terrified i am to live any part of my life without them. to lose my Dad, the man who i literally go to for everything - for every question, for every pain, for every support. and to lose my Mum, the light not just in my life, but in so many others' too. the person who i rely on in every way that you rely on a Mum - i genuinely cannot, nor do i want to, imagine a life without either of them.


but that's inevitable. because death is inevitable. and i cannot wrap my head around how nonchalant we are about something so significant, something so final. how does this fear not cripple anyone else?


we are so detached in society around the topic of death - we minimise people's lives to a headline in the paper, "man shot by dog". we deal with the dying as "it's a part of life" - but are people truly aware of what happens when someone dies? are they not overwhelmed by the reality of never seeing nor speaking to that individual again? and are people not afraid of this for their own life?


this topic occupies so much of my mind that i became a vegetarian over a year ago purely because i cannot bear the thought of an animal dying, let alone to eat something that has died. the thought that that animal is no longer, that its family will never interact with it again, is honestly both heartbreaking and sickening because it again makes me think about my life and the lives of those closest to me.


they say the only way to truly live is to be able to accept our own mortality. and i fear that if i can never get a handle on my own mortality, if i can't learn to accept the inevitability of everyone, i'll never truly be able to live. all i know is that right now, i'm a fucking mess thinking about all of this.


so, what occupies your mind?


51 views0 comments
bottom of page